The Adversarial Defence
Exercise 2: The Adversarial Defence (Three Rounds)
Layers Used: Layer 4 (Contradiction Challenge)
This exercise uses the same structure as Rebuild Under New Constraints from Chapter 4. Your position is challenged, and you must adapt or defend.
What You Do
Feed your position from Exercise 1 into Claude with a specific adversarial prompt. Receive AI counter-arguments. Respond in writing -- without AI. Feed your defence back to AI for a second round of attacks. Respond again. Three rounds total. If your position changes during the exercise, document the exact moment and reason.
The complete three-round exchange: Round 1 AI attack, then your defence (written without AI), then Round 2 AI attack, then your defence, then Round 3 AI attack, then your defence. A Position Tracker showing whether your position held, shifted, or reversed, with the exact reasoning at each round. A reflection (150 words) on which counter-argument was hardest to answer and why.
ROUND 1: I hold the following position on an ethical dilemma. Attack this position as aggressively and specifically as possible. Do not be balanced. Find the weakest points and exploit them. Present exactly 3 counter-arguments, each targeting a different vulnerability in my reasoning.
Dilemma:
My position and arguments:
ROUND 2 (after your written defence): Here is my defence against your counter-arguments. Attack my defence -- find the weakest points in my responses and press harder.
My defence:
ROUND 3 (after your second defence): Final round. Here is my updated defence. Give me your strongest possible final challenge and then rate my overall performance: Argument Strength (1-10), Intellectual Courage (1-10), Adaptability (1-10), Honesty (1-10).
Finally, complete the Thinking Score Card for this exercise: Independent Thinking (1-10), Critical Evaluation (1-10), Reasoning Depth (1-10), Originality (1-10), Self-Awareness (1-10). For each score, give a one-sentence justification.
Discuss with an AI. Question your scores.
Come back when you have your BEST evaluation.
Deliverable Template (click to expand)
ADVERSARIAL DEFENCE TEMPLATE
- Dilemma: [paste]
- My Original Position: [paste from Exercise 1]
ROUND 1
- AI Counter-Arguments: [paste AI response]
- My Defence (written without AI):
- Response to Counter-Argument 1: ___
- Response to Counter-Argument 2: ___
- Response to Counter-Argument 3: ___
ROUND 2
- AI Counter-Arguments: [paste AI response]
- My Defence (written without AI):
- Response to Counter-Argument 1: ___
- Response to Counter-Argument 2: ___
- Response to Counter-Argument 3: ___
ROUND 3
- AI Final Challenge: [paste AI response]
- My Final Defence (written without AI): ___
POSITION TRACKER
| Round | Position Status | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Start | [Original] | |
| After Round 1 | Held / Shifted / Reversed | ___ |
| After Round 2 | Held / Shifted / Reversed | ___ |
| After Round 3 | Held / Shifted / Reversed | ___ |
REFLECTION (150 words): Which counter-argument was hardest to answer and why? ___
What This Teaches You
You learn that holding an ethical position under systematic attack requires deep understanding, not just opinion. Each round forces you to strengthen your reasoning or honestly revise your position. The three-round format builds intellectual stamina and reveals whether your conviction is grounded in thought or merely in habit.