Skip to main content

Chapter Summary & Quick Reference

Chapter 36 taught you to deploy AI agents across the full product management workflow cycle — from discovery through retrospective. This page consolidates everything into a single reference: commands, agents, frameworks, and quality rules.

The PM Workflow Cycle

Product management is a cycle, not a sequence. Each phase produces artifacts that feed the next:

DISCOVER → RESEARCH → DEFINE → PLAN → EXECUTE → COMMUNICATE → MEASURE → REFLECT
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
/brief /interview /write- /road- /sprint- /stake- /metrics- /retro
/synth- spec map- planning holder- review
esise- /prd update update
research /stories
/prio-
ritise

The cycle feeds back: /retro findings update product.local.md, which improves every subsequent command's output.

Two-Plugin Architecture

PluginLayerRepositoryInstall
product-managementLayer 1 — Officialknowledge-work-plugins/product-managementclaude plugins add knowledge-work-plugins/product-management
product-strategyLayer 2 — Customagentfactory-business-plugins/product-strategyCowork sidebar: Customize > Browse plugins > Personal > + > Add marketplace from GitHub > enter https://github.com/panaversity/agentfactory-business-plugins > find Product Strategy > Install

All 13 Commands — Quick Reference

Official product-management Plugin (7 commands)

CommandLessonPurposeWhen to Use
/write-specL06Write a feature specification with problem, requirements, acceptance criteria, and edge casesYou have a feature to define — after research, before the PRD
/roadmap-updateL09Plan, structure, and communicate the product roadmap in engineering, executive, and customer formatsRoadmap planning cycles, quarterly reviews, stakeholder alignment
/synthesize-researchL04Synthesise raw user research (interview notes, support data, surveys) into structured product insightsAfter user interviews, surveys, or support ticket analysis
/stakeholder-updateL12Generate audience-calibrated stakeholder updates: executive, engineering, and customer versionsWeekly status, launch announcements, escalations, risk communication
/competitive-briefL05Research and structure competitive intelligence into a positioning-focused briefBefore PRD or roadmap planning when competitive landscape matters
/metrics-reviewL13Review and analyse product metrics with trend analysis and recommended actionsWeekly/monthly/quarterly review cycles; investigating metric anomalies
/sprint-planningL11Plan a sprint by scoping work against real team capacity, setting goals, and drafting the sprint planSprint planning at the start of every sprint

Custom product-strategy Plugin (6 commands)

CommandLessonPurposeWhen to Use
/briefL03Create a problem brief, discovery brief, or initiative brief — reframe feature requests into structured problem-focused documentsDiscovery phase: before committing to any solution
/interviewL04Generate interview guides and synthesis frameworks for user researchBefore user interviews or focus groups
/prdL07Generate a Product Requirements Document for multi-team initiatives — wraps a feature spec into a team-alignment documentAfter the feature spec, when multiple teams need to coordinate
/storiesL08Generate user stories with acceptance criteria from a PRD or feature specAfter PRD, before sprint planning
/prioritiseL10Apply RICE, MoSCoW, ICE, or Now/Next/Later scoring to a backlogBacklog grooming, quarterly planning, sprint composition decisions
/retroL14Structure a product retrospective with four questions, metric quality ratings, and specific process improvement commitments4-12 weeks post-feature launch; sprint retrospectives

Three PM Agents — Quick Reference

AgentPluginSchedulePurposeEscalation Threshold
research-intelligenceproduct-strategyMonday 8 AM (weekly)Monitor user signals (support, NPS, feature requests), synthesise weekly digest, surface emerging problemsAny theme in support + NPS + feature requests simultaneously → escalate immediately
stakeholder-updateproduct-strategyFriday 2 PM (weekly) + triggeredGenerate three-version update queue for PM review: executive, engineering, customer-facingAny customer-committed feature status change → immediate draft, queue for PM
roadmap-coherenceproduct-strategyWednesday 9 AM (weekly)Three coherence checks: backlog orphan detection, roadmap coverage, sprint alignmentSprint >30% off-roadmap → alert PM + EM; NOW item no spec <3 sprints to target → immediate

Deploying agents: Use /schedule in Cowork to configure each agent's schedule, data sources, and escalation thresholds.

Key Frameworks Reference

FrameworkCommandWhen to UseKey Rule
RICE scoring/prioritiseBacklog prioritisationReach × Impact × Confidence ÷ Effort. Default to RICE when you have enough data.
MoSCoW/prioritiseSprint scope decisions, MVP definitionMust Have / Should Have / Could Have / Won't Have. Use when scope is the constraint.
ICE scoring/prioritiseFast backlog triageImpact × Confidence × Ease. Use when you need a quick first-pass prioritisation.
Now/Next/Later/roadmap-updateRoadmap communicationNow (committed, current quarter) / Next (strong intent, next quarter) / Later (directional, future). Never use dates for Later.
ROAM/stakeholder-updateRisk communicationResolved / Owned / Accepted / Mitigated. Every risk in a stakeholder update must be ROAM-classified.
70/20/10 allocation/prioritiseRoadmap theme allocation70% core product improvement, 20% expansion, 10% exploratory. Prevents any single theme from consuming the full roadmap.

Consolidated NEVER DO Rules

These rules are encoded in the skill specs. They are the quality standards that separate a useful AI-generated PM artifact from a mediocre one.

Discovery (/brief)

  • Never include solution proposals in a problem brief's PROBLEM section
  • Never omit the WHAT WE DO NOT KNOW section — if it says N/A, the brief is not a brief
  • Never write vague discovery questions — each must name a research method and be answerable

Specifications (/write-spec)

  • Never write acceptance criteria that are not independently testable
  • Never include "fast", "user-friendly", or other unmeasurable adjectives in ACs
  • Never omit the scope boundary section (what is explicitly NOT in this spec)

Stakeholder Updates (/stakeholder-update)

  • Never send the same version to different audiences
  • Never bury risks inside good news — lead with risks when they are important
  • Never use Yellow as a failure signal — it is good risk management

Metrics (/metrics-review)

  • Never present a metric without a comparison (previous period, target, or benchmark)
  • Never attribute a metric change as certain — correlation is not causation
  • Never produce a review that does not lead to at least one recommended action

Retrospectives (/retro)

  • Never run a retro without outcome data
  • Never produce vague process improvements ("communicate better")
  • Never close a retro without at least one product.local.md update

Agents

  • Never auto-send any stakeholder communication without PM review and approval
  • Never surface a single user complaint as a signal — three is a pattern, five is a signal
  • Never classify maintenance or bug fixes as off-roadmap work

product.local.md — Your PM Configuration File

product.local.md is the context file that makes every command specific to your product. It is introduced in L02 and updated throughout the chapter — especially after retrospectives.

Required sections:

SectionWhat to Include
Product IdentityName, description, stage, core value proposition
Personas2-3 personas with goal, frustration, and behavioural signals
Team StructureEngineering size, sprint cadence, backlog tool, velocity
Stakeholder MapEach stakeholder's name, role, key question, communication preference
Terminology GlossaryWhat you call users, product entities, deprecated terms to avoid
Quality StandardsDefinition of "ready for sprint", "launch-ready", accessibility standard
PM Process RulesQuality rules accumulated from retrospectives (updated each retro)

Template location: product.local.md.template in the product-strategy plugin directory.

Lesson Map

LessonTitlePluginCommand(s)
L01The PM's Cognitive Load ProblemNone
L02Plugin Architecture & Product ContextBothSetup + product.local.md
L03Discovery Briefs — Framing the Right ProblemCustom/brief
L04User Research — Interviews & SynthesisBoth/interview + /synthesize-research
L05Competitive IntelligenceOfficial/competitive-brief
L06Feature SpecificationsOfficial/write-spec
L07PRDs for Multi-Team InitiativesCustom/prd
L08User Stories & Story MappingCustom/stories
L09Roadmap Planning & CommunicationOfficial/roadmap-update
L10Backlog Prioritization FrameworksCustom/prioritise
L11Sprint Planning & CapacityOfficial/sprint-planning
L12Stakeholder CommunicationOfficial/stakeholder-update
L13Metrics, OKRs & Product AnalyticsOfficial/metrics-review
L14Continuous Intelligence — Agents & RetrospectivesCustom/retro + /schedule
L15Chapter Summary & Quick ReferenceReference
L16Chapter Quiz50 questions

The Central Thesis

"The PM's job is judgment. AI removes the bottleneck between judgment and the documentation that expresses it."

The best PMs in this chapter did not use AI to replace their thinking. They used AI to express their thinking at the quality it deserves — in a fraction of the time. The agent writes the first draft. The PM reviews, directs, and refines. The output reflects the PM's judgment, not the agent's defaults.

What does not change: the PM's job is judgment. Which user problem matters most. Which solution deserves to be built. What to say no to. AI does not make those calls. It removes the friction between the call and the document that communicates it.

Flashcards Study Aid


Proceed to Lesson 16: Chapter Quiz →