First Principles vs. AI
Layers Used: Layer 1 (Predict Before You Prompt), Layer 5 (Divergence Test)
What You Do
You receive a problem with no established solution. No AI, no internet. 45 minutes. Identify the base constraints, list your assumptions, and derive a solution from those constraints alone. After submitting, prompt AI with the same problem and compare.
Choose Your Scenario
- Education
- Technical
- Community
Scenario A (Education): "Design a fair system for distributing limited AI tutoring access across a school district of 200,000 students with wildly unequal resources."
Scenario B (Technical): "Design a system that allocates limited GPU compute time fairly across 500 research teams with different project sizes, deadlines, and funding levels."
Scenario C (Community): "Design a fair system for distributing limited disaster relief supplies across 50 neighborhoods with different population densities, damage levels, and access to alternative resources."
Choose one.
A First Principles Worksheet containing: (1) the base constraints you identified (e.g., limited supply, unequal need, multiple definitions of fairness), (2) every assumption you made -- explicitly listed, (3) your derived solution with a clear logical chain from constraints to design, (4) a comparison document showing your solution alongside AI's solution, with annotations on where they converge and diverge.
I solved a novel problem using first principles reasoning without any
AI or internet assistance. The problem: "Design a fair system for
distributing limited AI tutoring access across a school district of
200,000 students with wildly unequal resources."
Below is my First Principles Worksheet. Please:
(1) Evaluate my constraint identification -- did I find the real base
constraints or did I miss critical ones?
(2) Review my assumption list -- which assumptions are reasonable and
which are questionable? What hidden assumptions did I not list?
(3) Does my solution logically follow from my stated constraints, or
are there gaps in the derivation?
(4) Rate my solution's originality -- is this something you would
generate if prompted directly, or does it show genuine independent
reasoning?
(5) What is the single biggest flaw in my solution that I need to
address?
(6) Now solve the same problem yourself. I will compare our approaches.
My worksheet: [paste your First Principles Worksheet].
Finally, complete the Thinking Score Card for this exercise:
Independent Thinking (1-10), Critical Evaluation (1-10),
Reasoning Depth (1-10), Originality (1-10), Self-Awareness (1-10).
For each score, give a one-sentence justification.
Deliverable Template (click to expand)
FIRST PRINCIPLES WORKSHEET
- Problem: [paste]
- BASE CONSTRAINTS:
- ___ (things that are true regardless of approach)
- ___
- ___
- MY ASSUMPTIONS (explicit):
- ___
- ___
- ___
- DERIVATION CHAIN: From constraint [#] + assumption [#], it follows that: ___
- Therefore, the solution must: ___
- MY SOLUTION: ___
- WHY this follows from the constraints (not from analogy or pattern): ___
- WHAT I DO NOT KNOW: ___
What This Teaches You
You learn what it feels like to reason from nothing — no patterns to borrow, no AI to lean on. Comparing your solution to AI's reveals whether you produced genuine first-principles thinking or unconsciously borrowed familiar patterns. The constraint identification skill becomes foundational for every design and architecture decision in the rest of the book.